Article Text

Download PDFPDF
AB1394 MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TENOSYNOVIAL GIANT CELL TUMOUR/PIGMENTED VILLONODULAR SYNOVITIS IN THE ERA OF SYSTEMIC TARGETED THERAPY
  1. M. Cochard1,
  2. M. Chevalerias1,
  3. D. Waast1,
  4. V. Crenn1,
  5. B. Le Goff1
  1. 1CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France

Abstract

Background: Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumours (TGCT) is a rare benign but locally aggressive synovial tumour that can impact joint function and quality of life. The emergence of systemic treatments targeting CSF-1 has changed patient management, particularly for diffuse-type TGCT (D-TGCT)..

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the management strategy and follow-up of patients referred to Nantes University Hospital

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective descriptive observational study. We included all new cases of diffuse-type (D-TGCT) or localized-type (L-TCGT) managed in our hospital between January 2010 and June 2023. Patient selection was performed using keywords in the hospital database. We included adult patients with TGCT involving large and medium-sized joints. The diagnosis was based on biopsy or typical findings on MRI.

Results: A total of 105 patients (mean age 38±15 years), 63% female 37% male, 41% diffuse-type (D-TCGT), 59% localized-type (L-TCGT) were included. The most involved joint was the knee (75%), followed by the ankle (14%) and hip (7%). The most commonly reported symptoms were pain (80%), followed by joint effusion (32%). Patients were referred to the orthopaedic surgeon or rheumatologist in 72% and 28% of cases respectively. On these 61% were referred to our center for therapeutic management with a pre-established diagnosis, 24% needed additional diagnostic investigations (MRI or biopsy) and 15% came directly with non-specific symptoms. The diagnosis was most frequently made on MRI, with only 24% undergoing a biopsy prior to a therapeutic decision-making. The most common treatment strategy was surgical synovectomy (53%), systemic targeted therapy included tyrosine kinase inhibitors (4%) and joint injection (isotopic or triamcinolone) (4%), while wait and see treatment was a fairly common treatment strategy (37%). The proportion of TCGT undergoing surgery did not differ between D-TCGT and L-TCGT. For unoperated D-TCGT, wait and see treatment (32%) was preferred to medical treatment (16%). The median number of consultations during a median follow-up of 12 months was 2 (Q1-Q3=2) [0-11]. A significant number of patients were lost to follow-up regardless of treatment (29.5%) with no predictive factors identified. Thirteen patients (13%, 26% of D-TCGT) underwent a second therapeutic sequence because of recurrence of their TCGT.

Conclusion: Our findings showed that systemic targeted therapies still have a limited role in our center compared with surgery which remains the first-line treatment in the management of TCGT patients. Wait and see was a fairly common strategy. We also found that a significant number of patients were lost to follow-up. Overall, these results highlight the need for a multidisciplinary approach to improve management and follow-up of TGCT patients.

REFERENCES: NIL.

Acknowledgements: NIL.

Disclosure of Interests: None declared.

  • Synovium
  • Targeted synthetic drugs
  • Descriptive Studies

Statistics from Altmetric.com