Table 4

Sensitivity and specificity of candidate criteria: AS versus NSBP

CohortAB
SensSpec (NSBP+HC)LR+LR−SensSpecLR+LR−
Global assessment1.000.95 (0.94)19.50<0.010.980.835.680.01
ASAS definition0.830.76 (0.74)3.390.230.710.742.690.39
MORPHO definition0.980.72 (0.71)3.540.030.880.723.160.16
ER ≥20.980.97 (0.97)30.420.030.770.907.930.24
BMO ≥20.830.76 (0.74)3.480.230.730.732.700.36
BMO ≥2 and/or ER ≥10.980.72 (0.71)3.540.030.880.702.920.16
BMO ≥2 and/or ER ≥20.980.73 (0.72)3.620.030.870.713.040.18
BMO ≥30.800.89 (0.88)6.930.230.640.844.020.43
BMO ≥3 and/or ER ≥10.980.85 (0.84)6.340.030.850.794.070.17
BMO ≥3 and/or ER ≥20.980.85 (0.85)6.610.030.840.824.700.18
BMO ≥40.800.92 (0.92)10.400.220.630.874.880.43
BMO ≥4 and/or ER ≥10.980.88 (0.88)8.010.030.840.804.170.18
BMO ≥4 and/or ER ≥20.980.89 (0.89)8.950.030.830.835.060.19
  • Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios are expressed as mean values over four readers. The gold standard for calculating sensitivity and specificity was rheumatologist expert opinion.

  • AS, ankylosing spondylitis; ASAS, Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society definition: ≥2 SIJ quadrants with BMO on the same MRI slice or BMO in the same SIJ quadrant on ≥2 consecutive MRI slices; BMO, bone marrow oedema; ER, erosion; HC, healthy control; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; MORPHO, ≥2 SIJ quadrants with BMO on the same MRI slice or BMO in the same SIJ quadrant on ≥2 consecutive MRI slices or ≥2 SIJ quadrants with erosion on the same MRI slice or erosion in the same SIJ quadrant on ≥2 consecutive MRI slices or ≥1 SIJ quadrant with BMO plus ≥1 SIJ quadrant with erosion4; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NSBP, non-specific back pain; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity; SIJ, sacroiliac joint.