Download PDFPDF

AB0241 PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOLOGISTS AGED ≤ 40 YEARS HAVE DIFFERENT PRIORITIES AND PERSPECTIVES ON DISEASE MANAGEMENT: THE ITALIAN SOCIETY FOR RHEUMATOLOGY YOUNG (SIRYOUNG) COMMISSION SURVEY
Free
  1. S. Alivernini1,2,
  2. S. Perniola3,
  3. M. Bardelli4,
  4. A. Batticciotto5,
  5. E. Bozzalla Cassione6,
  6. F. Crisafulli7,
  7. S. Gentileschi8,
  8. N. Luciano9,
  9. D. Mauro10,
  10. M. Orlandi11,
  11. S. Sciacca12,
  12. A. Ortolan1,
  13. M. Todoerti13,
  14. M. Fornaro14,
  15. L. Andreoli7,
  16. C. Chighizola15
  1. 1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Division of Rheumatology, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Immunology Research Core Facility - Gemelli Science and Technology Park (GSTeP), Rome, Italy
  3. 3Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Division of Clinical Immunology, Rome, Italy
  4. 4Azienda Ospedaliera Senese – Policlinico Le Scotte, Rheumatology Unit, Siena, Italy
  5. 5ASST Settelaghi - Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Rheumatology Unit, Varese, Italy
  6. 6IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo – University of Pavia, Division of Rheumatology, Pavia, Italy
  7. 7ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Brescia, Italy
  8. 8Dipartimento di scienze mediche, chirurgiche e neuroscienze, Università di Siena, Rheumatology Unit, Siena, Italy
  9. 9IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rheumatology Unit, Rozzano, Italy
  10. 10Università degli Studi della Campania L. Vanvitelli, Division of Rheumatology, Naples, Italy
  11. 11University of Florence, Rheumatology Unit, Florence, Italy
  12. 12University Hospital “Policlinico Foggia”, Rheumatology Clinic, Foggia, Italy
  13. 13Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo, Rheumatology Unit, Alessandria, Italy
  14. 14Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Rheumatology Unit, Bari, Italy
  15. 15ASST Gaetano Pini – CTO – University of Milan, Division of Rheumatology, Milan, Italy

Abstract

Background Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) represents a huge burden for patients’ quality of life and there are still relevant unmet needs in its management due to uncovered patients’ needs even once sustained remission is achieved.

Objectives This study aimed to investigate disease burden, treatment priorities and preferences across disease phases comparing patients’ and physicians’ perspectives.

Methods Consultants or residents in rheumatology (across Academic and non-academic hospitals) and patients with RA both aged ≤40 years were reached by an anonymous online survey between November 2021 and November 2022, designed by the SIRyoung commission. For each included RA patient, demographic and clinical parameters (RA diagnosis timing, current and previous treatments) were collected. For each included physician demographic, education and professional profile details were collected.

Results Two-hundred seventy-four consultants or residents in rheumatology and 90 RA patients, both aged ≤40 years, completed the online survey. All Italian regions were equally represented for both physicians’ and patients’ subgroups. Considering the patients’ disease referral status, 26(28.9%) received RA diagnosis at the very early stage (≤3 months), 33(36.7%) at early stage (3-12 months) and 31(34.4%) after 12 months from symptoms’ onset. When asked for the priority in RA treatment objectives, the survey revealed a different priority among the subgroups with a higher importance given to fatigue resolution (p<0.0001) and morning stiffness reduction (p<0.0001) by patients and to radiological damage prevention (p=0.01) and disability reduction (p=0.0108) by physicians, while comparable priority was given by the 2 groups to pain relief, physical function restoration and work-ability recover (p>0.05 for all). When asked about the factors that could improve RA management, the survey revealed higher agreement scores for patients compared to physicians in educational need (p<0.0001), increase of outpatient visits and access to treatment (both p<0.0001) and use of digital apps (p<0.0001). Stratifying patients based on self-perceived disease control, 30(33.3%) were well controlled, 52(57.8%) moderately controlled and 8(8.9%) very poorly controlled. When questioned about their will to treatment modification once sustained remission status is achieved, patients showed a higher agreement of maintaining the treatment unchanged (p=0.0002) and a higher fear of modification consequences (p<0.0001) compared to physicians, mostly if not guided by the treating rheumatologist or out of established decisional algorithms.

Conclusion Young patients with RA and young rheumatologists have variable agreements on treatment aims and priority. In particular, when dealing with the sustained remission status, a shared decisional algorithm between physicians and patients is needed to reduce patients fear and improve their empowerment.

REFERENCES: NIL.

Acknowledgements: NIL.

Disclosure of Interests None Declared.

  • Remission
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Health services research